Luscombe 8 N2305K

Summary

On 31 August 2018 at about 18:00 local time, a Luscombe 8 registered N2305K was involved in an accident near New Carlisle, Ohio, United States. One person was on board and one was seriously injured. The aircraft was substantially damaged. The NTSB has published a probable cause for this accident; it is quoted in full below.

Date

31 August 2018 at 18:00

Classification

Accident

Location

New Carlisle, Ohio, United States

Nearest airport

Andy Barnhart Memorial Airport (3OH0)

Coordinates

39.9317, -84.0248

Aircraft

Luscombe 8

Registration

N2305K

Category

Airplane

Year built

1947

Engines

1

Operator

Not recorded

Operating rule

Part 91: General Aviation

Purpose of flight

Personal

Phase of flight

Not recorded

Route

New Carlisle → Versailles

Aircraft damage

Substantial

Weather

VMC

Light

Day

NTSB number

CEN18LA362

1 person was seriously injured.

A total loss of engine power shortly after takeoff due to carburetor ice.

Quoted verbatim from the NTSB record. This site does not paraphrase or interpret it.

Read the full NTSB narrative

The pilot reported that the airplane exhibited reduced climb performance during takeoff and that the engine began running rough when the airplane had climbed to about 150 ft above the ground. The pilot turned on the carburetor heat, but then removed carburetor heat when he perceived an increase in engine roughness. The engine subsequently lost total power and the pilot performed a forced landing, resulting in substantial damage to the forward fuselage and right wing. Examination of the airplane and engine did not reveal any evidence of mechanical malfunctions that would have precluded normal operation. Both fuel tanks contained fuel, the vented fuel caps were not obstructed, and there was uncontaminated fuel found in the carburetor fuel bowl. The weather conditions at the time of the accident were conducive to the formation of carburetor icing at a descent engine power setting. Although the pilot did not observe any evidence of carburetor ice when he verified function of the carburetor heat control before takeoff, given the lack of engine anomalies, the pilot's description of reduced climb performance and the rough-running engine was consistent with the accumulation of carburetor ice. The reported increase in engine roughness after carburetor heat was applied is further evidence of carburetor ice, but the pilot’s momentary application of carburetor heat would have been ineffective in removing the ice and restoring engine power. Additionally, the low altitude at which the loss of engine power occurred significantly reduced the amount of time available to the pilot to troubleshoot and restore engine power before the forced landing.

Quoted verbatim from the NTSB record.