Cessna 172 N737NB

Summary

On 4 December 2020 at about 22:11 local time, a Cessna 172 registered N737NB was involved in an accident near Palm Springs, California, United States. One person was on board and one was seriously injured. The aircraft was substantially damaged. The NTSB has published a probable cause for this accident; it is quoted in full below.

Date

4 December 2020 at 22:11

Classification

Accident

Location

Palm Springs, California, United States

Nearest airport

Palm Springs International Air (KPSP)

Coordinates

33.8297, -116.5067

Aircraft

Cessna 172

Registration

N737NB

Category

Airplane

Year built

1977

Engines

1

Operator

Not recorded

Operating rule

Part 91: General Aviation

Purpose of flight

Instructional

Phase of flight

Not recorded

Route

Palm Springs → Palm Springs

Aircraft damage

Substantial

Weather

VMC

Light

Day

NTSB number

WPR21LA080

1 person was seriously injured.

The student pilot’s failure to maintain aircraft control during an attempted go-around, which resulted in an exceedance of the airplane’s critical angle of attack, aerodynamic stall, and subsequent impact with terrain.

Quoted verbatim from the NTSB record. This site does not paraphrase or interpret it.

Read the full NTSB narrative

The student pilot and her flight instructor performed three takeoffs and landings to a full stop prior to the accident. During this time, the flight instructor observed no engine anomalies. He exited the airplane and the student pilot then performed two successful takeoffs and landings to a full stop. On the third landing attempt, the airplane touched down hard, bounced, and began to porpoise. The student pilot attempted a go-around and started a shallow climb. The airplane leveled off about midfield before it turned left and entered a nose-down dive and impacted the ground. Surveillance video showed the airplane in a shallow climb and subsequently captured it leveling off before starting the left turn. A postaccident engine examination revealed severely worn intake tappets and camshaft lobes; however, this wear would have occurred over time and is not likely to have demonstrated as a sudden loss of power. Further, it is doubtful that the engine suffered a loss of power as the student pilot and flight instructor did not recall noticing any deficiencies with the engine prior to this flight and no other abnormalities were noted during the engine examination. One witness reported that the airplane appeared to be producing less power than it did during prior operations in the traffic pattern. However, the investigation could not substantiate this statement with other evidence. The investigation did not find any preimpact mechanical anomalies or failures with the airplane’s flight control system. The investigation was unable to determine why the student pilot made a left turn after initiating the attempted go-around as the student pilot was unable to recall any details about the accident flight. The available evidence is consistent with her failure to maintain aircraft control during the subsequent climb and exceeding the airplane’s critical angle of attack, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall and subsequent impact with the ground.

Quoted verbatim from the NTSB record.