Plane Crash List

Cessna 310R N310JR

11 March 2011 · Smyrna, Tennessee, United States · Fatal

Summary

On 11 March 2011 at about 19:43 local time, a Cessna 310R registered N310JR, operated by Hudson Management Corporation, was involved in an accident near Smyrna, Tennessee, United States. One person was on board and one died. The aircraft was substantially damaged. The NTSB has published a probable cause for this accident; it is quoted in full below.

The record

Date
at 19:43
Classification
Accident
Location
Smyrna, Tennessee, United States
Nearest airport
Smyrna Airport (MQY)
Coordinates
35.9417, -86.5208
Aircraft
Cessna 310R
Registration
N310JR
Category
Airplane
Engines
2
Operator
Hudson Management Corporation
Operating rule
Part 91: General Aviation
Purpose of flight
Flight Test
Phase of flight
Not recorded
Route
Smyrna → Smyrna
Aircraft damage
Substantial
Weather
VMC
Light
Day
NTSB number
ERA11FA185

People

1 person died.

On board Died Serious Minor Uninjured
1 1 0 0 0

Probable cause

The pilot's improper response to a known autopilot pitch divergence anomaly. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's decision to perform a test flight on a system for which he lacked a complete working knowledge.

Quoted verbatim from the NTSB record. This site does not paraphrase or interpret it.

Read the full NTSB narrative

Shortly after departure, the airplane entered a rapid, full-power, near-vertical descent from about 2,700 feet above ground level to ground impact. The elevator trim actuator was found in the full tab-up or airplane nose-down position after the accident. The flight was the second flight of the day and was the fourth in a series of maintenance acceptance flights after the installation of a new avionics suite and a new autopilot system. Before the accident flight, all of the features of the autopilot system tested satisfactorily on the ground but did not yet function as designed in flight, as the airplane demonstrated a pitch-porpoise tendency when the altitude hold feature was engaged. According to the technician who performed the installation and troubleshooting work on the airplane, he had accompanied the pilot on the first flight that day and had spoken to an autopilot manufacturing representative upon their return. Another troubleshooting procedure was performed, the technician left for lunch, and the pilot departed alone on the accident flight. When describing a previous test flight, the technician stated that the pilot worked the yoke against the autopilot, and, in response, the autopilot ran the elevator trim to the full nose-down position. The pilot responded by swiping both panel-mounted master switches to the off position (autopilot on/off switch and the trim on/off switch) then attempting to trim the airplane with the electric trim that he had just disabled. According to the technician, the pilot yelled at him to turn the system off, and the technician responded that it was off. He said that the pilot’s actions scared him and demonstrated to him that the pilot really didn't have control of the airplane. He noted that, "After the flight, I told [the pilot] he needed to go back and get in the books and learn to operate the system. He seemed very disoriented with the new technology on this flight and previous flights." Based on the available evidence, it is likely that, after autopilot engagement, the airplane pitched down as a first action of the pitch porpoise, which may have still existed as a discrepancy in the autopilot operation. In response to the downward movement of the airplane, the pilot likely pulled back on the yoke in an effort to arrest the airplane's descent. As a result, the autopilot would have commanded the trim further toward the nose-down position. Such a scenario would require a greater and ever-increasing physical effort by the pilot to overcome the growing aerodynamic force that would result from the nose-down pitch and increasing speed of the airplane. The pilot may have removed one hand from the yoke to again reach for the panel-mounted trim and/or autopilot master switches. With that action, discounting any physical problem, he may have lost his single-handed grip on the control yoke, and the airplane descended in an unrecoverable nose-down attitude.

Quoted verbatim from the NTSB record.

Other Cessna 310 accidents

Date Aircraft Location Operator Outcome Died
27 Feb 2011 Cessna 310K
N3816X
Angleton, Texas, United States Arthur Hale Consulting/Instruction, LLC Serious injuries -
1 Jan 2011 Cessna 310F
N6725X
Orange, Massachusetts, United States - Fatal 1
9 Jan 2011 Cessna 310C
N1755H
Lancaster, California, United States Bush John L No injuries -
30 Mar 2011 Cessna 310R
N1914G
Pikeville, Kentucky, United States Miller Aviation LLC Fatal 2
1 Apr 2011 Cessna 310F
N6781X
Sanford, Florida, United States Edward Moon No injuries -
5 Feb 2011 Cessna 310R
VH-XGX
Bathurst Island, Australia, Australia Private Individual Fatal 1

All 1,745 records for this type

Other accidents in this area

Date Aircraft Location Operator Outcome Died
15 Jun 2011 Beechcraft A100
N15L
Gray, Tennessee, United States Dynamic Avlease Inc No injuries -
15 Jun 2011 Cessna 525A
N129SG
Nashville, Tennessee, United States Deer Horn Aviation Ltd Co No injuries -
3 Oct 2011 Loehle LOEHLE P-40
N414L
Tullahoma, Tennessee, United States - Minor injuries -
7 Oct 2011 Piper PA-18-150
N3491Z
Elizabethton, Tennessee, United States - Minor injuries -
11 Dec 2011 Shaw Douglas Wayne RANS S 7
N347DS
Somerville, Tennessee, United States Miller IRA L Fatal 1
9 Oct 2011 Aeronca 0-58A
N46513
Westmoreland, Tennessee, United States Henderson Blake W No injuries -

All 170,864 records in United States